Pdf library mit license vs apache

To begin with, the apache license was created with computer software in mind, as a freeopen license that requires a softwares source code to be freely available. If youre looking for a reference table of every license on. Gnu general public license gpl gnu affero public license agpl. The mit license is a permissive free software license originating at the massachusetts institute of technology mit in the late 1980s.

Not all the libraries using the apache license are from the apache software foundation asf. To inspect the license terms please consult the license and notice files in. Apache pdfbox 2 was released earlier this year and since then, apache pdfbox 2. Apache adherents believe that software can be free and is perhaps best when free. If you have some code you are thinking of releasing under an open source license, and you want a quick overview of the broadstrokes differences between these licenses, you have come to the right place. Why corporations favors the apache license over the gpllgpl. Qt contains some code that is not provided under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl or the qt commercial license, but rather under specific licenses from the original authors the qt company gratefully acknowledges these and other contributions to qt. As a permissive license, it puts only very limited restriction on reuse and has, therefore, high license compatibility it is compatible because it. So in the apache faq the asf references their own software. Pdfsharp and migradoc foundation are open source and free to use.

I read that i should add them in my file, but the thing is my project is a site constituting of php files, is there a certain file that i. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. Requirements for using an apachelicensed library open. Mit license a short and simple permissive license with conditions only requiring preservation of and license notices. Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. Under the gpl, you must always provide the source code. In general, software distributed under the mit license, bsd modified license or the apache 2. We also recommend that a file or class name and description. Mit license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category. A detailed listing of the most popular, recently updated and most watched mit license licensed packages online discover open source libraries, modules and frameworks you can use in your code toggle navigation. Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the open source definition in brief, they allow software to be freely used, modified, and shared.

Open source java libraries to create pdf documents itext vs apache fop. The apache software license was based in large part on bsd and mit style licenses. Library open source license best practice library technology. Unlike the apache license, the gpl embeds the decision as to the codes open source nature into the code itself. Apache pdfbox is published under the apache license v2. Compare these products for pdf generation with java given. These class provide a simple way to construct documents and add the contents. The apache pdfbox library is an open source java tool for working with pdf documents.

To apply the apache license to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets replaced with your own identifying information. Facebook recently relicensed its open source projects react, jest, flow, and immutable. The information i gathered up to this point is a bit confusing, but it looks like a simple and proper way to comply is to have an about section in the app or something like that and cite some details for each library that was used name and author mostly and provide links to. Kcp a fast and reliable arq protocol that helps applications to reduce network latency. Apache pdfbox also includes several commandline utilities. Pdfsharp and migradoc foundation are published under the mit license. License shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by sections 1 through 9 of this document. The mit license requires reproducing countless copies of the same header with different names in the field, for every mit library in use. The following osiapproved licenses are popular, widely used, or have strong communities. Mit license vs creative commons detailed comparison as of. I found many ruby gem are licensed under apache license or mit. Copy, modify and integrate the source code of pdfsharp and migradoc foundation in your applications without restrictions at all. What are the essential differences between the bsd and mit.

I have this open source code with mit license that uses an apache 2. However, this is not the primary motivation for me. Tldrlegal provides generally good summaries of licenses. All software produced by the apache software foundation or any of its projects or subjects is licensed according to the terms of the documents listed below. This project allows creation of new pdf documents, manipulation of existing documents and the ability to extract content from documents. The mit license is permissive enough that anyone can take your code, rebrand it and sell it. Copyleft licenses are licenses that require redistributed copies and derivative works to be under the same license. Difference between different types of open sources licenses. The apache license, on the other hand, is favored by the big corporations for their open source projects. To get help on using pdfbox, please subscribe to the users mailing list and post. We recommend that programs that use qt also acknowledge these contributions, and quote these license statements in an appendix to the.

I want to include this in my project, so it can be built right away. Lgpl license is incompatible with apache license issue. Whatever your pdf needs are today or in the future, we have a solution for you. Jetty web container copyright 19952012 mort bay consulting pty ltd. The common understanding while i was working on apache code a while back was that you could incorporate bsd, mit, and similar licensed libraries but you could not do the same for gpl based licenses. View in hierarchy view source export to pdf export to word. Templates are written in the freemarker template language ftl, which is a simple, specialized language not a fullblown programming language like php. I never used a library that i needed to include the license before, so i have no idea where to add them. Everything you should know about android pdf library. Apache license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category.

Notice that the popular licenses featured on the home page gnu gplv3 and mit fall within this spectrum. For harvard library created open source projects, the library is motivated to release software under a license that is common in the library community and is as simple. Does not prevent others from taking and selling your software. Apache mit licensed libraries in a closedsource app. The mit expat license doesnt protect against opensource code being taken without payment and used in proprietary software. Do apachelicensed libraries also count as apache softwares. Apache gives huge protections for unforeseen scenarios. Licensed works, modifications, and larger works may be distributed under different terms and without source code.

Add advanced pdf capability to your java or android applications. The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. I am using a library that is under the mit license. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. Differences in distribution, linking, modification, private use of open source licenses like mit, gnu gpl, apache 2. The unlicense vs mit license detailed comparison as of. Yet, many foss licenses, like the apache license, and all free software licenses.